Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Why the Country Continues to Rely on Fossil Fuel Use

The United States is currently reliant upon fossil fuels to meet our growing energy needs. We use coal for more than half of our electricity needs. Additionally, America's transportation system is overwhelmingly dependent on conventional petroleum oil, which is not only responsible for 20 percent of our climate change pollution, but also threatens our national security and our economic prosperity. We spend $1 billion every day on foreign oil.

Coal PileThe production and use of fossil fuels—also known as "dirty fuels"—for electricity and transportation fuels are not only contributing to climate change, but they also cause health problems, destroy our wild places, and release toxins such as mercury and arsenic into our communities.

Developing clean and renewable energy and innovative technology can help solve this problem. The National Wildlife Federation fights to protect people and wildlife from harmful fossil fuels through legislation and advocates for the development of clean energy.

The Problem with Fossil Fuels

Coal is America's most abundant source of climate change pollution—and we have a lot of it in the United States. We currently use coal for over half of our growing electricity demand, but this comes at a great cost to our environment and our health.

  • Pollution from burning coal is responsible for nearly 30 percent of the climate change pollution in the U.S. and it puts our communities and wild places at risk from dirty air (from mercury and other pollutants), acid rain, and a variety of health problems such as asthma and other respiratory diseases;
  • Coal mining (such as mountaintop removal) destroys vast amounts of land, pollutes our rivers and streams, and has significant environmental effects on local communities and wildlife.
  • Coal ash sludge, another by-product of burning coal, is stored in waste ponds all across the country. These ponds are leaking into our waterways, destroying entire ecosystems, and having traumatic effects on wildlife and our communities all across the country

Even worse, as conventional petroleum oil becomes scarcer and more expensive, industry and governments around the world are pushing to develop even dirtier fuels to power our transportation sector: tar sands, oil shale, and coal to liquids.

  • Tar Sands—The U.S. is currently importing over 1.3 million barrels of the world's dirtiest fuel, known as tar sands. Tar sands mining and extraction is responsible for the destruction of huge amounts of Canadian forest ecosystems, toxic contamination of massive amounts of fresh water, and significant increases in climate change pollutants into the atmosphere.
  • Oil Shale—The United States is home to approximately 50 percent of the world's oil shale deposits. A vast majority of the world's oil shale reserves can be found in the Rocky Mountain states of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, which also supports an abundance of mule deer, elk, mountain lion, black bear, bald eagles and other wildlife. Oil shale extraction is not only extremely costly, but it has also been shown to have significant environmental effects on local water and air quality, wildlife habitat, and energy use.
  • Coal to Liquids—Due to the abundant coal resources in the United States, proponents of "liquid coal" see this fuel as a long-term, stable source for the transportation sector. However, the production of liquid coal proves otherwise: the process emits twice as much climate change pollution as gasoline and requires at least four gallons of water per gallon of fuel produced.

Each of these unconventional dirty fuels emits high levels of climate change pollution and comes with a unique set of risks to human health, our landscapes, and our water resources. The National Wildlife Federation is working to stop a new generation of these super-polluting fuels before they become the new face of America's energy and further push the world's climate over the tipping point.

Tar Sands and Oil Shale

About 75 percent of the oil shale and tar sands in the Green River Basin are located in lands managed by the federal Bureau of Land Management, a division within the Department of the Interior. Due to the efforts of the National Wildlife Federation and others, the Bureau significantly reduced the public lands that it would make available for oil shale and tar sands extraction, cutting the number of acres by two-thirds to conserve other important resources in the area, including wildlife and water.

Still 700,000 acres of public land in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming remain available, first for research and development of extraction technologies and then commercial production of oil shale. Approximately 130,000 acres are open for production of tar sands. U.S. tar sands have a different composition than those in Canada and are not yet commercially viable. However, several companies are attempting to do so right now on private and state lands in Utah.

Fossil Fuel Subsidies

Each year, the U.S. provides billions of dollars in subsidies to companies in the fossil fuel sector. This taxpayer money could be better spent investing in renewable energy, like offshore wind and solar, and energy efficiency which will decrease our dependence on fossil fuels, reduce hazardous pollution, and help spur new jobs in the clean energy sector.

borgerbeell1944.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.nwf.org/Our-Work/Environmental-Threats/Climate-Change/Fossil-Fuels

Post a Comment for "Why the Country Continues to Rely on Fossil Fuel Use"